Welcome Guest [Log In] [Register]

Announcements (Updated: July 11, 2018)

Welcome to Swifty's Garage!


Thanks to all of you for making this board what it is today!


Attention new members: We would like to welcome you personally, so please introduce yourself. Click here: INTRODUCTIONS


For all the latest news and announcements, please click here: PA System



Thank you - The Swifty's Garage Team




This board is best viewed at 1024 x 768 Resolution

Car of the Week:


Matchbox 1968 Ford F-100


Click Here: Matchbox '68 Ford F-100
Welcome to Swifty's Garage. We hope you enjoy your visit.


You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free.

Thank You,
The Swifty's Garage Team


Join our community!


If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features.

Username:   Password:
Add Reply
Scale
True 1/64 15 (93.8%)
"3 inch" (Whatever fits in the blisterpack) 1 (6.3%)
Total Votes: 16
Scale
Topic Started: Mar 22 2008, 01:58 PM (803 Views)
Swifty
Member Avatar
The Mustang II is a Mustang too!
Who here likes their cars to be in scale with one another? In other words, they want their Impalas huge and their VWs tiny.

My biggest problem with JL has always been the scale issue. I'm not a fan of dwarfism on full size cars (like the Matchbox '63 Cadillac hearse) or gigantism on compact cars (like the JL Honda CRX). This is one area that Greenlight has gotten right since day 1.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Lovemy1971Camaro
Member Avatar
Speed Junkie
I like the idea of true 1/64 personally. It would be nice to see a tiny Pacer next to a full size Chevy pickup truck. You're right, Greenlight has seemed to get this right from day one. I think true 1/64 also helps eliminate all the distortion you see in some of the Johnny Lighting cars. Like the new Chevy wagon they have out. Just a little too narrow for my tastes. This is just one example of course.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Swifty
Member Avatar
The Mustang II is a Mustang too!
Not only is the Caprice wagon too narrow, and they chopped the rear of the car off to fit it into the packaging!
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
bob8748
Member Avatar

*In Memory Of*
I agree. Put th Karman ghia next to a school bus for example. :angry:
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
james_autos
Member Avatar
Minivan
I prefer die-casts to be in scale with one another, and not just sized to fit in the packaging. Siku springs to mind as being the most accurate, scaling all of their cars to 1:55, which is why I use them on my layout.

Greenlight are better than JL at scaling their cars properly, but I can think of one or two that don't look right, one being the '79 Corvette, which is tiny!
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
jedimario
Member Avatar
RAWR
I the answer here is pretty obvious

:P
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Lovemy1971Camaro
Member Avatar
Speed Junkie
:) I think this one was pretty much a no brainer! Unfortunately I don't see Johnny Lightning changing their ways. For one, they'd have a lot of retooling to do if they actually wanted to make all their casting accurate.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
craftymore
Member Avatar
Support your local demo derby.

It would be nice if JLs AMC Gremlin was not as wide as the clamshell 73 Carprice. I guess all we can do is to complain untill the car is recast in correct proportions. Scale is the only real complaint detail wise that JL misses on an annual basis.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Swifty
Member Avatar
The Mustang II is a Mustang too!
11 to 0 so far. Looks like correct scale is a selling point to more people than just me! :thumbup: That's why I've really come to love Greenlight. If I'm not mistaken the Corvettes were among Greenlight's earliest castings, and may have been manufactured before they decided to go to 1/64 true scale only. Or maybe the '79 Corvette really is at 1/64 (I don't know- I don't have one in my collection to check on).
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
James
Member Avatar
Mr.Bowtie
This brings up the question "why do so many people dislike Jada?" I have not checked but some one mentioned to me that they are a clopser to 1/64 on most of there cars then most of the other diecast companies.

Or is what we want a consistant scale, pick one and have all your castings match it. If we got a constant scale we would never see a Chevy Bus or the Box truck in the line up. But yes it gets a little wierd when you park an 59 Eldorado next to a VW beetle or a Gremlin. Now the Pacer is supposed to be as wide as an Eldorado but definately not as long.

:twocents:
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Swifty
Member Avatar
The Mustang II is a Mustang too!
Jada's are mostly at 1/55-1/50 scale, much larger than 1/64. What comes closer to 1/64 are the '60s Cadillacs they do. They also subscribe to the blisterpack method of sizing cars, though some earlier issues (like the Astro) are smaller than later offerings.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
ivantt
Member Avatar
New casting? Quick! Take it apart!
As many of you would know from postings by me at the Garage, I am big on proper proportions of a casting. I'm not so concerned about one precise scale, but I certainly get irked when I see a car that doesn't "look" correct. Too narrow is the big reason I have not bought many JL's. Also, "high headed" cars really bug me because it throws off the entire look. This is a real pet peeve of mine because designers and the toolmakers keep getting this wrong. Why can't they see it when window lines are way too tall or bodies way too slim?

Even though I always say you have to breath through your nose and remember they are just toys, I won't buy cars that look conspicuously wrong.

Example: It took me a long time to buy a JL 2005 type Mustang, because the front end is too flat and squared off and they missed the very bulging hood completely! The backlite is huge--a hatchback Mustang? I noticed the casting looked wrong as soon as I glanced at it. :( I like the Mustang very much and was very disappointed, but since I do like the car so much, I finally relented and bought some for my collection. But they'll stay in my storage case won't get any camera work!

I had to VOTE for YES on the scale issue. I'd prefer large cars to be larger than compacts. Or at least make all of the same type cars the same size.....Mattel surely didn't do that with the various years of GTO's and Corvettes for example, and they look silly if you park one of each year next to each other.

Good topic :thumbup: , and it shows that collectors really DO want accurate and scaled cars. :)
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
James
Member Avatar
Mr.Bowtie
Here Here :thumbup: :thumbup:
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
craftymore
Member Avatar
Support your local demo derby.

After reading this thread, this got me to wonder. Does anyone directly affliated with JL or LC2 read the threads on the Garage?
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
seveland
Member Avatar
Muscle Car Fanatic
I like true scale. i hope Greenlight continues to grow and will one day include more common cars like "frsh cherries", pickups and SUVs, and even big rigs since ERTL seems to be doing less and less in that field.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Lovemy1971Camaro
Member Avatar
Speed Junkie
craftymore
Mar 24 2008, 08:34 PM
After reading this thread, this got me to wonder. Does anyone directly affliated with JL or LC2 read the threads on the Garage?

Probably, but not often. Though I can't verify that they do.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Swifty
Member Avatar
The Mustang II is a Mustang too!
ivantt
Mar 24 2008, 11:42 AM
Example: It took me a long time to buy a JL 2005 type Mustang, because the front end is too flat  and squared off and they missed the very bulging hood completely!  The backlite is huge--a hatchback Mustang? I noticed the casting looked wrong as soon as I glanced at it.  :(  I like the Mustang very much and was very disappointed, but since I do like the car so much, I finally relented and bought some for my collection.  But they'll stay in my storage case won't get any camera work!

Exactly! I had the same problems with the JL '05 Mustang casting, as voiced in this thread when the casting was still new: http://swiftysgarage.net/index.php?showtopic=59

That said, I wish my Mustang was a hatchback. It's design is perfect for one, and it would increase the day to day practicality of the car substantially. They've done hatchback 'Stangs before, and as long as a 4 cylinder motor never becomes available in the Mustang ever again they'll be fine.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous)
« Previous Topic · Bay 1: Johnny Lightning · Next Topic »
Add Reply



March's Picture of The Month Contest



Congratulations DinoMom for winning March's contest!



April's Picture of The Month Contest



Congratulations carsdownunder for winning April's contest!






Powered By

This board is best viewed at 1024 x 768 Resolution


eXTReMe Tracker