|
|
|
| Welcome to Swifty's Garage. We hope you enjoy your visit. You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free. Thank You, The Swifty's Garage Team Join our community! If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features. |
| American Grafitti | |
|---|---|
| Tweet Topic Started: Oct 6 2009, 11:15 PM (317 Views) | |
| Stangfreak | Oct 6 2009, 11:15 PM Post #1 |
![]()
Convertible
|
American Grafitti by Revell![]() ![]()
|
![]() |
|
| Swifty | Oct 7 2009, 02:07 AM Post #2 |
![]()
The Mustang II is a Mustang too!
|
See, this is how a manufacturer should do a 'Hollywood On Wheels' type release. Accurate castings, not just slap any old license on any old casting that might sort of fit the theme (I'm looking at Matchbox and JL on this one!). |
![]() |
|
| James | Oct 7 2009, 04:19 AM Post #3 |
|
Mr.Bowtie
|
Don't forget Motormax.... |
![]() |
|
| Dadvball | Oct 7 2009, 04:46 PM Post #4 |
![]()
Dadvball
|
I have these somewhere. Definitely better than the JL version, which I got rid of. |
![]() |
|
| ivantt | Oct 7 2009, 07:14 PM Post #5 |
|
New casting? Quick! Take it apart!
|
Certainly look good, much better than other brands. But keep in mind that Revell was primarily a plastic model maker and those type folks like to get things right, not like many diecast companies who still think "just a toy" instead of accuracy. |
![]() |
|
| Swifty | Oct 8 2009, 02:31 AM Post #6 |
![]()
The Mustang II is a Mustang too!
|
Exactly why the Revell "Bullitt" Mustang and Charger look better than anything Racing Champions ever put out! |
![]() |
|
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
| « Previous Topic · The Showroom · Next Topic » |
| Track Topic · E-mail Topic |
9:33 AM Jul 11
|












9:33 AM Jul 11